Showing posts with label Coelacanth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coelacanth. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

0

COELACANTH

What is a coelacanth?
Coelacanths are an ancient group of large, lobe-finned fish . They were thought to be extinct for the last 70 million years until a living coelacanth was caught off of South Africa in 1938. How long have coelacanths existed? Fossil records show that coelacanths have existed for about 400 million years, which makes them one of the oldest living animals lineages on earth.
Where in the world are coelacanths found?
Millions of years ago, coelacanths lived in waters all over the world but now they are only known to exist in two small areas of the world: Comoro Islands near Africa and in Manado Tua, North Sulawesi.
What is special about coelacanths?
Many people are interested in coelacanths because they are rare and they are a living fossil. A living fossil is an organism that has not changed in millions of years. For example, if dinosaurs were still alive today, they would be a living fossil too.
What are some unique features of the coelacanths’ appearance?
Coelacanths have seven thick, fleshy, lobbed fins that move in the water in the same manner as a four-legged animal, such as a trotting horse. They also have an extra tail on the end of their body called an “epicaudal” lobe, which no other fishes have. Coelacanths also have a joint on their skull, which is thought
to allow them to open their upper jaw upward when
capturing prey.
How many coelacanths exist today?
The coelacanth population around the Comoro Islands is estimated to be less than 500 individuals. The population at Manado Tua is not yet known. Other populations may exist in other part of Indonesia, or even in the rest of the world but they have not yet been

Source:

http://www.bunaken.org/index.php?berita=3&lang=

Thursday, July 9, 2009

0

Darwin Missing link Coelacanth

This week the scientific community has stated to unveil the missing link of Darwinism.  They counted down to its opening curtain, revealing the said to be 47 million year old fossil named Ida (Darwinius masillae). But before we get too excited, remember the missing link was also claimed to be found in 2006 with Fishapod Tiktaalik roseae, as well as the Coelacanth, that was found to be alive and swimming.

There is a war out there; each side is trying to bury the other.  Recent developments like the Louisiana Academic Freedom Act that can allow alternative teachings to Darwinism fuel the controversy further. Although I am not an extremist on either side, meaning although not an Atheist, I do not believe that God keeps snow in its storehouse or opens floodgates allowing the water that is stored on top of the Earth to fall giving us rain.

I think the best way to solve the controversy is to accept the theistic evolution interpretation of Genesis 1 where it states, "And God said, Let the Earth bring forth the living creature" and "Let the waters bring forth abundantly."  This allows the teaching that God let the Earth and waters do its thing and create life, which would not contradict Darwinism or religion.

The creation of man can be interpreted as a special event, God using a pre-existing template from an animal and creating something new.  This is also known as progressive creation..

Some churches have had debated introducing theistic evolution.  One thing for sure is, if Darwinism is proven to be true, the churches will be forced into theistic evolution.  Remember it was only in 1992 that the Roman Catholic Church admitted Galileo was correct.  Despite the announcement of Ida, the megachurches are not closing down this week.

What do you think about the announcement that Ida, the "missing link of Darwinism," has been discovered?

0

Coelacanth Fish History Fiction

"And the world will descend again into primordial slime!" said our host.

"Primordial slime!" We raised our glasses and drank.

Under the circumstances it would have taken a very, very stupid man to do otherwise. If he'd wanted us to drink the damned slime we'd have been delighted to oblige. As it was, it might have been preferable to what we were drinking. Perhaps if you had a coiled shell, and an indeterminate number of ropy, slimy tentacles striped in alternating fire-engine red and puke green, this might be your favorite tipple. I met someone once who thought ouzo was magnificent stuff, so anything is possible. He'd quite have liked this brew. It was greenish milky-colored, aniseed-scented and highly alcoholic. "The finest of old Atlantis's brews," said our host with all the nostalgia that only an extremely large Ammonite can put into the writhing of his tentacles. "Back from before the lease lapsed and the tenants got evicted."

"Tastes like ouzo," said Stephen Speairs, determined to prove that nearly getting us all killed once wasn't bad enough. The last time . . . well Wales and whales do have a lot in common. All right . . . Maybe it was just my experience. Whales are grey and what I remember of Wales was grey too, although that might have been the mist, drizzle and then torrential downpour, and some blurred vision caused by falling off the back of a bike and protecting the beer in my hand instead of my head. One has ones own perceptions and priorities. Reluctantly, I have to admit that sometimes they're wrong. I have been told that Wales is beautiful and that beer is replaceable and heads are not. I take the scientific approach to these matters and require proof.

"Ouzo! Humph." Snorted the ammonite Cthulhu, spraying us all with a fine dusting of ink. " Greeks. Upstarts. They stole the idea from us. It was . . . But we claimed it back and made it better."

"How?" I looked at the cloudy green liquid again.

"We added a distillation of wormwood. Artemisia absinthum."

Which could just explain how come we were drinking with the worlds largest potential supply of calamari. Absinthe—or the green fairy—was supposed to be hallucinogenic. Right now the hallucination theory was more attractive than being on a seaweedy island, that showed signs of being underwater recently, somewhere in the middle of the chillier parts of the South Pacific, with creatures that either belonged in Paleolithic history or in the dark pages of old horror novels, or possibly both.

Our arrival here in R'yleh had been clouded by a little a little awkwardness. That and ink. Mark Twain said you should never argue with a man who buys his ink by the quart. This is true. I'd like to add the Dexter Guptill corollary: "You should really, really never argue with a megalomaniacal thirty ton proto-cephalopod who produces ink by the forty-four gallon drum." Along with: "When buildings start sprouting tentacles it is probably time to give up the sauce. Or drink a lot more of it," that may go down in the annals of history as two of my greatest wise sayings.

Cthulhu had been somewhat upset by our apparent liking for whales. It turns out the ammonites are all called Cthulhu. It's sort of like "Bruce and Sheila" except Sheila's called Cthulhu too. To avoid confusion, to explain it Monty Python terms. It also explains—besides their regenerative powers—why killing Cthulhu is like searching for the logic in New Zealand Immigration laws (which is why Cthulhu was found on a remote island in the South Pacific, not Wellington, where it should be), a task which is more difficult than trying to persuade the Flatwoods Monster to attend a Labour Party conference in Blackpool. Trust me. I've tried both. Not killing Cthulhu, the other two. Cthulhu was of course mind-bogglingly evil and planning to return the world to oceans full of primordial slime—in other words, she was a sort of fairly normal politician, and one with more good points than average. "So what is the difference between this stuff and absinthe?" I asked. I was quite proud of that conversational gambit. You can tell Guptill is at his best after being wrapped in a vast suckered tentacle and sprayed with ink.

Cthulhu shrugged, which is quite a sight in a thirty-ton ammonite. There was a lot of it to quiver. "Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder. This stuff just makes you stoned." She was drinking it by the quart.

"You can't get absinthe any more," explained Dann Douglas. "They stopped selling all Thujone-containing liquors a good half century ago. But you can still get Cthulhu-juice at the convocations."

"Convocations?" asked Stephen Speairs, as calmly as if he hadn't been the cause of our tentacle encounter.

"You know, when the guys—low, mixed-blood types like me according to Lovecraft—get together and chant 'Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn' and sacrifice a few victims, talk about the coming of the end of the world and then get completely pie-eyed on Cthulhu-juice and end up sleeping with someone you would rather not have. Rather dull really. But it is tax-deductible. Cultist meetings, conventions, who can tell the difference?" explained Dann.

Thinking about it I had to admit he was right. I'd been a good few scientific conventions that could have been described as much like that.

"So how did you end up caught up in all of this?" asked Speairs.

Dann sighed. "Caught up is the right word. I am . . . or was once . . . a big game fisherman. I thought I would catch all of the largest species of fish in the sea. I started in a quite an ordinary way—salmon in Siberia, Giant Trevally in Cosmoleto. Then I got into collecting records. Monstrous catfish in the Mekong. Sailfish. Then sharks... and I became obsessed with Megalodon. And in following up the reports . . . found myself here."

"Reports?" I asked, scenting the famous pong of an urban legend.

"Of a very large shark. Possibly the largest to ever swim," he said, sadly. "Megalodon."

"Carcharadon megalodon," I said. "Or Carcharacoles megalodon, depending on which side of the taxonomic fence you land on. I've been out of it for a while so I don't what the thinking is these days."

"Probably thinking you don't have a clue what you're talking about," said Stephen cheerfully lighting another coffin nail. "I don't." How he had dry and uncrushed cigarettes at this stage of our misadventure must remain a mystery to me.

"Do you know what a great white shark is? I asked, cursing myself. Thanks to "Jaws" everyone thought they knew. Most of them thought it was something with the intellect of Einstein, and the desire for blood of Rambo . . . which was about right, except for a few minor details. Like it was actually the intellect of Rambo, and as bloodthirsty as Einstein. Yeah, yeah. They're big carnivores. They eat seals. They eat relatively few tourists, as even big dumb carnivores with brains the size of Bob Mugabe's conscience know that anything that eats tourist food is likely to give you secondary poisoning. We probably taste vile.

"Big sharks that eat people," said Stephen, obliging me.

"Well, you're half right. They can get up to about eighteen feet long and can weigh in at near four thousand pounds. Bigger than your average carp. So yes, they're big."

"But there were stories of bigger ones, far bigger ones, from the coast of Australia," said Dann. "Fish of up to thirty-six feet. That was the record for many years."

"The stories didn't stand closer inspection. Whale sharks, Basking sharks, just plain exaggeration."

Dann shook his head. "And if you dig far enough and go back far enough, you have reports from the Atlantic, the Stronsay beast, which was fifty-five feet long and identified as a shark from a close examination of its vertebrae. But for frequency and size they all came down to the South Pacific. Port Fairy was a whaling and sealing port . . ."

"Ah, back down to whales," said Stephen.

I snorted. Sharks are my interest. "Thirty-six feet long, it was supposed to be. . . . And when they examined the jaw, they decided it was a serious error of measurement and that it was merely seventeen feet long."

Dann fixed me with a manic stare. "Aha . . . If they examined the right jaw, Mister Guptill."

Stephen Speairs chuckled. "Yeah they probably looked at the left jaw. That came from a smaller fish."

By the way Dann looked at him I could tell this came under the heading of "not very funny." "I tracked down the original jaw," he said. "The incident happened in 1870 in South Australia—it was a pretty wild and woolly place in those days. Museums weren't secured the way they are now. And there were some big great whites being caught in that area. Someone swapped the jaws in late 1800's. I found the real one, the original. The real jaw came from a Megalodon. A juvenile Megalodon."

"Stupid, badly behaved brat, served it right," said Cthulhu. "Always too greedy."

"But why would anyone swap the jaw for that of a smaller fish? And why keep it secret . . ." I asked, in spite of my self.

Dann jerked a thumb at his monster master. Well, he had stopped us from being devoured, over the confusion about Wales. "I think Cthulhu just answered your question."

"We bred them to try and control whale numbers. Ungrateful, that's what they are. To so bite the tentacle that feeds them," said the vast ammonite. I was doing my best to pretend I wasn't drinking something alcoholic and hallucinogenic with a monster that promised world domination and destruction. This sort of statement made that pretense hard.

"I guess it might be easier to get people to believe a fisherman might exaggerate the size of fish a tiny bit," admitted Stephen, with the reluctance of a true fisherman.

Dann nodded. "Yes, all they needed to do was add a tiny bit of doubt, and people believed there was good reason for it. No one ever believes fishermen's stories."

"All true fishermen are intrinsically honest," I said defensively. "I can prove this. None of them work in the South African banking industry."

They looked at me in puzzlement. Obviously this joy had never come their way. "So?"

"Trust me. According to my experiences, if they did, you couldn't trust them." It suddenly occurred to me that Stephen might possibly be a banker. It didn't look likely, but still. "You're not in banking are you?"

His shoulders shook. "No. But I still don't see why it proves that all fishermen are honest."

"Not all. Only the true fishermen. The salt of the earth, the good fellows who would give you their last bloodworm, the lads who would share their whiskey with you. The other kind are lower life forms," I explained.

"Hm. I seem to have met a fair number of bankers in angling pubs. Well, more like outright liars, because they claimed to be in almost every other profession, and yet they'd caught some amazing fish in unlikely places," said Dann.

"Ah!" I said the light dawned. "Pubs. That's different. They may cause good men to... exaggerate a trifle. It's the shortage of oxygen in your average crowded and smoke-filled pub. Watch. The no smoking rule will shrink fish by 25%. But really it's more a case of wishful thinking and the hitherto unknown elasticity of their arms, caused by alcohol. Really, it makes arms stretchy. But as for Megalodon . . . no one's arms are that long, no matter how elastic."

"So its a shark. A really, really big shark?" said Stephen Speairs with the sort of tenacity that should have worried me.

I nodded. "The biggest ever. The teeth are mostly what we have for evidence. They're about seven inches high."

"Seven inch high sharks? Wow." Speairs laughed.

"No, the teeth, you . . ." I took a look at the size of him. Swallowed the "moron" part. He wasn't. Irritating maybe, but he at least knew something about Cthulhu. "We're still guessing shark length as no one really knows what shape their bodies were. If you assume that it was something like a Great White—well you can guess at something like forty to sixty feet long.

"There have been larger estimates," said Dann. "A hundred feet," he said, dreamily. "Sixty tons . . . but even a forty-foot shark would destroy any attempt to catch it on rod and line. Destroy a trawl net. You're not going to catch one easily. Only the juveniles are even slightly vulnerable."

"Still, they have been extinct for at least one and half million years," I said.

Dann raised his eyebrows. "Like the coelacanth. No fossils since the end of the cretaceous."

It was a venerable defense. "The coelacanth is a deep water species. . . ."

Dann smiled with the delight of man who has tricked you into clinching his argument for him. Cthulhu poured more drinks. "And it is notable that most of the Coelacanth fossils came from shallow seas. Yet all the experts claim it was not found in the intervening time because it's a deep water species."

I'd dealt with that one before. "That's because that is where we can access the fossil material. It seems that all the Megalodon teeth came from shallow water dredges. They were a tropical coastal water species . . ."

"Which preyed on whales and pinnipeds—which, of course, are always far more abundant in resource-poor tropical oceans. You never get them among the krill in the great southern ocean," said Dann dryly.

Speairs chuckled. "I think the sarcasm meter just exploded."

"The water may have been too cold for them." I said, fighting a rearguard action. The Greenland Shark proved some sharks could live and thrive in icy water.

Dann looked at me over his steepled fingers. "Or—just as Great Whites have temperate distribution and raise their body temperature by the rete mirabile and gigantothermy, the same might just have applied to Megalodon, only more so."

Stephen took a long deep swallow of the green fairy. "Okay. You just lost me completely. That was Latin. I can smell Latin a mile away. It's usually used to make ordinary things sound like black magic or the law."

"An arterial/venous countercurrent heat exchanger, which enables the fish to raise its body temperature, despite being poikilothermic," I explained.

Stephen nodded. "Thank you. I'm an expert at foreign languages. And that was definitely Greek to me. I could tell by the way I didn't understand a word."

"Means it is warmer than the water it is living in, despite not being what you would call 'warm-blooded,'" Dann explained. "And because they are so big, the heat inside can be retained efficiently. Like dinosaurs, and," he said with a sneer of distaste, "whales."

"And elephants. They only live in arctic." I said, dryly.

Never waste your sarcasm the products of the British schooling system. "I thought that was the mammoths. Or was it mastodons. Never been too sure which was which."

"Both, said Cthulhu mournfully. "Very respectful and very tasty."

"It still doesn't answer the fact that remains: the teeth were found in shallow sea, temperate and tropical areas . . ." I said tenaciously.

"Mastodon teeth or mammoth teeth? Or dentures from the Spice Girls?" asked Speairs.

"Gah. The latter of course. Shark teeth, naturally. We're talking about sharks."

He nodded. "Megalo-whatsits. Great in those salmon streams for digesting the moneyed classes."

"Sadly, Megalodons are a bit large for the average stream, and they're allergic to waxed cotton. They're rare to mythical fish. You wouldn't want to waste them on those, even if you could find them." I said, unwarily accepting a refill.

"Well," said Dann, "I decided that they used to occur in the Southern ocean, and probably the arctic as well. They also used to follow the migratory whales. Keep in deep cool water, and nip in for a bite—which sometimes ended in lost teeth. These things happen when you dine on whales. And if there was going to be relict population anywhere, it had to be in the southern oceans, probably somewhere near 48º9'S, 123º43'W.

"A piece of ocean without anything at all," I said, envisaging it. It was, indeed one of the least visited pieces of the sea—thousands of miles of nothing.

"Also where Lovecraft betrayed R'lyeh to be," said Cthulhu glumly. "We don't have a lot of private spots to haul out and get the parasites off our shells, and that lowlife has to go and cooperate with the faceless one and his CIA lackeys to betray it. Do you know how much effort that cover up was? We had to try and track down all the original copies of the February 1928 Weird Tales and substitute them with the same story but a slightly different line of Latitude. Couldn't just disappear them or have our acolytes eliminate all the purchasers of Weird Tales, tempting though it was. We never quite got them all."

"So how come it doesn't come up on Google Earth?" I asked.

"We made certain arrangements," said Cthulhu, loftily. "Anyway, that's need to know basis information."

I looked at the glass of green fairy. I really had to stop drinking this stuff. "And so: I suppose you never caught Megalodon, Dann. You wound up here instead, occasionally dropping into bars in Mozambique."

His eyes took on a faraway look. "Yes. I caught a Megalodon. But no one told me they were telepathic. I should have guessed. Most fish are to some degree. That's why it is possible to catch salmon. They are, but their minds are so taken up with sex that they can be fooled. Otherwise—well, in some species the group mind is weak, too taken up with food. Of course, in some species even the group mind fails to achieve that critical threshold of intelligence, the level of the junior French railway official, and they never even attain the semblance of sentience. In other cases—if the fisherman is mindless enough, or paying attention to something else such as pornography (which confuses most fish), they can fool the prey, even if they could have read his mind. But when dealing with really large minds . . . you need more help."

He looked at us. "At that time I still believed it was just a question of tackle and tactics. Of being in the right place at the right time. I should have guessed because the right time to have been in a particular place is always . . . last week. Or next week. It is too much of a coincidence that the fishing is always better when you're not in that spot."

"That is an experience I've had," I admitted.

"I decided that the answer was lots of chum, and of course, some kind of longer range super-attractant. The sharks had to be successfully following the whales, which meant they had to be using something about the whales to track them. Whales use sound to communicate across large distances . . . a species that preyed principally on whales might actually be using that very thing. Now, sound is more of a mammalian thing but I figured evolution might have driven the sharks in this direction."

"Selective breeding," said Cthulhu. "But they've abused it. We're in dispute about it."

"Which is why they've been engaged in industrial action for the last fifty years," explained Dann. "The Megalodons learned a fair amount from humans."

Cthulhu made a schlurping sound with its suckers. "Can't get decent help these centuries."

"Well, you can hear a sperm whale six miles away underwater, and a blue whale a hundred miles away. So you must it admit it was easier to find the baleens than the toothed whales," said Dann, apparently trying to be reasonable. It had the air of a well-worn argument.

"Excuses," said Cthulhu grumpily. "When we return the oceans to primordial slime, the whales will all have to go, but in the meantime humpback tunes are very popular with the younger Cthulhu. Anyone under forty millennia has no discernment. Rorqual music! Huh. More like raucous music. Not a patch on a patch on a

0

Coelacanth Maritime History

An innovative partnership between the government and business sector aims to develop Boracay’s eco-tourism potential. And the beauty of the project, dubbed Geo-Marine Aquapark, is that it is being pursued as part of the United Nations’ Coral-Triangle Initiative (CTI) that groups six countries in an ambitious plan to regenerate coral formation.


The Coral Triangle covers Indonesia, Timor-Leste, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and the Philippines. It spans 6.5 million square kilometers, or almost half the size of the United States, and is home to over 600 reef-building corals.


Joining together in the public-private sector partnership are the provincial government of Aklan and the Eco-Coral Corp., a subsidiary of Winace Holdings, a conglomerate that is into business-process outsourcing, tourism and shipping. Chaired by Tuesday Club members Teodorico Haresco Jr., the firm is embarking on the aquapark next month. This coral-regeneration project in Boracay, now with just 2 percent of natural corals due to cyanide fishing and jet skiing, would ultimately showcase the Philippines’ commitment to the Coral Triangle Initiative that was approved during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) summit in Sydney, Australia, in September 2007.


That Apec summit agreed on the launch of the six-nation coral-regeneration project as part of the regional group’s adherence to the UN Climate Change Conference. Pitching in for the project are the US government, which pledged $4.35 million, and Australia, which expects $25 million for the program. The said initiative was brought by worldwide concern on the devastation of the Coral Triangle, known to be the epicenter of marine-life abundance and diversity on the planet. In fact, it is home to 3,000 fish species that includes whale sharks and the coelacanth that lived before the dinosaurs.


Aklan’s political leaders, led by Rep. Florencio Miraflores and Gov. Carlito Marquez, shall spearhead the delineation of the Geo-Marine Aquapark sanctuary, while the private sector’s Eco-Coral Corp. shall donate P10 million worth of its patented, pH-neutral artificial coral-reef product which will be assembled in various underwater formations, designed to beautify Boracay’s waters, while rehabilitating her denuded coral formations. Due to various reasons like cyanide fishing, jet skiing and the like, the world-famous Boracay has lost much of its coral reef.
An allied goal of Eco-Coral is the generation of livelihood and food security, which is expected to grow as flourishing coral formations attract and revitalize marine biodiversity. The project manifests the Philippines’ first, valid and creative contribution to the United Nations’ CTI, which prioritizes the call for the protection of marine biodiversity as a means to sustain livelihood and food security. In June 2008, in Washington, D.C., President Arroyo, recognizing the UN CTI’s long-term value, called for its support, stating that it is “good for our people, for jobs, for growth and for a healthy, sustainable environment to make initiatives like CTI work. Our people will only suffer more in the long run of we do not invest today for our generations tomorrow.”


Heeding the call, Eco-Coral’s programs also serve as the Winace Group of Companies’ corporate social responsibility. “While our goal [supports] Aklan tourism and livelihood through Boracay, we’re also taking a longer view. We leave this legacy behind for others, including our children, to benefit from,” says Haresco.


In the Geo-Marine Aquapark, Eco-Coral’s state-of-the-art corals will be deployed to resemble various underwater structures, including an underwater altar. “We’re raising Boracay’s [tourist] attractions to the next level,” says Haresco. “It will be possible to get married in Boracay, underwater!” Other plans include coral formations in the shape of a sunken vessel, which divers can swim through. In support of the program, Technostrat Corp., an affiliate of Eco-Coral, plans to establish an observation platform and “aquaman” underwater walking systems. Eco-Coral expects the Geo-Marine Aquapark project to be established in time for the Holy Week crowds heading to Boracay.


The joint public-private undertaking in Boracay is expected to open a new business frontier: eco-tourism. With the underwater altar set to be installed as part of the coral-regeneration project, Boracay can be marketed as a place for unique events such as an underwater wedding, or as a meeting place for like-minded conservationists, or as a place with a remarkable marine diversity.
Just recently, the bottle-nosed dolphins that were stranded in Bataan have their home in the so-called Coral Triangle. The same is true for the clown triggerfish which is a valued aquarium fish, the humpback whale and the manta ray, among other marine creatures. With this rich marine diversity that could be saved from environmental ruin on account of the loss of coral reefs, Boracay and its environs can become a destination of choice for tourists. Tourism, after all, results in increased income for the local townfolk.


Winace Holdings, in pursuing its coral-regeneration project in partnership with the government, can then lay claim to developing Boracay’s eco-tourism potential. With the effects of the financial meltdown, tourists now want to go to so-called experiential tours where the objective is to have unique experiences, such as that offered by Boracay’s myriad coral fishes plus some more. This is a sustainable business for the country that could help it withstand the pernicious effects of the global financial crisis.


This is one project that transcends national boundaries. As Indonesian President Yudhono said in launching the Coral Triangle Initiative: “Now is a time for action.... I want you to know that I am deeply committed to this initiative—it is one of my top priorities. I intend to do everything in my power to ensure its success. Together, we can create a more sustainable future for the people of this region.”

0

Coelacanth Japan Game

一早出門, 又是個雨天。最近正逢雨季, 已經連下了好幾天雨了!! 趁著下雨天, 又是清晨, 我趕緊取來釣竿, 準備再來試試運氣。那隻我一直找不著釣不到的魚......Coelacanth, 牠雖然是一整年都會出現的魚, 但只會在晚上跟清晨9:00以前, 還要加上有 "下雨" 或 "下雪" 的條件下, 才會出現。

RUU_0008.JPG

因為需要多重條件, 再加上又是稀有魚類, 真的是讓找得好辛苦喔! 據說還有人在冬季飄雪的惡劣天氣裡, 一等就等了四個多小時, 沒想到今天特別好運的我, 竟然只等了半個小時, 就在接近九點時, 我幾乎要放棄了, .........結果就給釣到了! (雖然之前也在海邊站崗了不知多少回, 空等了多少個小時了)

哇~哈~~哈~~~哈~~~哈~~~~

教我如何不開心呢?!

RUU_0010.JPG

根據書上記載, 牠可是一隻難得的活化石呢!! 又根據本鎮律法, 第一個居民釣到的新種類, 都得捐到博物館, 因為儘管我很喜歡, 儘管我百般不願意的想把牠佔為己有, 但為了避免觸法, 被驅逐出境, 只好趕快把牠捐出去了。

RUU_0018.JPG

歡迎大家來Good Town的博物館看活化石--Coelacanth喔!

RUU_0023.JPG

喔~對了, 既然來了, 可別忘了順便來看巨大而美麗的牠們, 鯊魚、斧頭鯊還有翻車魚喔!

RUU_0018.JPG

0

Coelacanth theory of evolution

I was just sent a link to this press release. Is this a parody or something?

Shaking up the theory of evolution

In a year that celebrates the 200th anniversary of the birth of Darwin and the 150th anniversary of the publication of “On the Origin of the Species, Murdoch scientists have made an exciting discovery. Their hypothesis, which argues that DNA junk is essential for evolution, may represent one of the biggest advances in evolutionary theory, since the 1930s.

Murdoch University scientists have developed an improved theory of evolution – a groundbreaking hypothesis which finally reconciles evolutionary theory with the fossil record.

Developed by PhD student Keith Oliver and Program Chair of Biomedical Sciences Dr Wayne Greene, the “Genomic Drive” hypothesis, potentially represents one of the biggest advances in evolutionary theory since the 1930s.

DNA “junk”

In a co-authored report, due to be published in the prestigious BioEssays journal, the researchers argue that transposable elements (TEs) – or what is colloquially termed jumping genes, selfish or junk DNA, have a critical role in ensuring the survival of biological lineages.

Without this DNA junk, a species is effectively frozen and faces eventual extinction.

On the other hand, species with genomes with high TE activity or strong presence of identical TEs possess a greater ability to evolve, diversify and survive.

Take for example humans, rodents and bats.

As primates some 46 per cent of the human genome is comprised of TEs while other mammals such as rodents and bats are known to possess around 40 per cent.

These TE’s are generally suppressed in the ordinary body cells of most species but are allowed to reactivate in reproductive cells for the potential benefit of the next generation.

Their activity can also be triggered when they suddenly hop between species or by stress.

TEs do their survival work by reformatting and rearranging DNA genomes to sometimes create significant adaptive mutations that undergo natural selection.

Current theory doesn’t tally with fossil evidence

Dr Greene, a Senior Lecturer in Molecular Genetics, said current evolutionary theory, which assumed biological lineages evolved by the slow accumulation of adaptive mutations, did not tally with the fossil record.

However, the “Genomic Drive” theory provided a significant explanation for the way new species arose abruptly and periodically.

The theory also fitted with fossil records which showed intermittent and long periods of stasis – where many species stood still or remained the same.

Mr Oliver said the hypothesis argued that significant evolution could not take place without the activity of TEs.

“Although we are standing on the shoulders of others that have worked on TEs, we believe this is the strongest and most comprehensive case ever put forward on the role of TEs in evolution,” Mr Oliver said.

“If our theory proves correct it would be one of the biggest advances in evolution since the 1930s when Darwinism and Mendelism were reconciled in NeoDarwinism.”

Species without junk DNA risked extinction

Dr Greene said species that were devoid of TEs were more at risk of extinction because they simply lacked the capacity to adapt, change and diversify.

“If you don’t have this junk in your genome then you can’t evolve and are stuck, thereby remaining in what is termed evolutionary stasis,” Dr Greene said.

“This would explain why almost all species control their TEs rather than eliminate them.

“And of course having these TEs in a genome doesn’t mean a lineage will necessarily diversify. What it does mean is that it has a much greater potential to do so.”

Mr Oliver said an example of evolutionary stasis occurring in species without TE activity could be seen in the living fossil, the coelacanth, once thought to be extinct for 63 million years.

The coelacanth, which had been found off the coast of South Africa and Indonesia, had inactive or low levels of TEs and had been in stasis for 400 million years.

In another example he referred to the tuatara, where just two species had been found off the coast of New Zealand.

Like the coelacanth, the tuatara was characterised by very few jumping genes and has been unchanged for 220 million years.

An explanation for many unanswered questions

Dr Greene said Genomic Drive theory provided an explanation for many unanswered questions such as why species suddenly appeared in the fossil record, why some groups of organisms were species rich and others species poor and why some species changed little over millions of years.

Successive waves of TE activity in a lineage potentially explained alternations of rapid evolution and stasis.

He said some species – such as bats which “came out of nowhere” in the Eocene Period – suddenly appeared in the fossil record.

This was in keeping with evidence that TE or jumping gene activity occurred in sudden episodic bursts.

Improving the ability to diversify, adapt and survive

Dr Greene said an example of how TE activity affected the richness of a lineage was seen in rodents and bats.

These were species-rich orders of mammals and, unusually for modern mammals, both harboured highly active TEs.

Although there wasn’t enough data yet, the presence of TEs could also help to explain why one order of birds, commonly known as the Songbirds, (the Passeriformes) accounted for over half of all bird species and why the Perciformes accounted for 40 per cent of fish species.

While jumping gene activity in the 235 species of primates had quietened down a lot since its peak about 40 million years ago, the high presence of identical TEs in the primate genome pointed to an improved ability to diversify, adapt and survive.

By comparison a cousin of the primate, the Flying Lemur, lacked a key TE that primates had in abundance and only two species of it remained.

0

Coelacanth Fish Indonesia Manado

Whenever someone discovers a specimen of a species thought extinct, there is cause for celebration. Throughout the world, no one quite knows what really lurks deep in the dark, murky waters of the international oceans and seas decorated the globe. It appears that the waters surrounding Indonesia has been serving as home to a well-received member of the "alive and well" family of fish. This article offers additional insight.

A species once thought extinct has surfaced in the midst of an Indonesian fisherman, who reeled in the rare coelacanth, which offers a glance at an actual "living fossil." Justinus Lahama was lucky enough to nab the 4-foot, 100-pound creature as fished off of Sulawesi Island, which is situated close to Bunaken National Marine Park, where some of the most intriguing displays of marine life in the world can be found.

Unfortunately, according to marine biologist, Lucky Lumingas, the fish died 17 hours later, which is considered a great feat for this type of fish. This is because the coelacanth only thrives within the deepest parts of a cold-sea environment. In actuality, the fish should have perished within two hours of being caught. The "extinct" wonder continued to push the limits of its existence.

Lumingas, who is employed at the locally positioned Sam Tatulangi University, is planning on studying the ins and out of the coelacanth's carcass.

What is a Coelacanth?

The coelacanth was once thought extinct until one of the fish made an appearance off of the coast of Africa in 1938. Before then, it is believed that the species dates back millions and millions of years ago. When it was determined that a coelacanth was found, the public fell in love with the notion that something that old still existed in the waters. Since then, other specimens of the coelacanth were located, including another find about Sulawesi Island that took place in 1998.

Coelacanths first make a showing on the fossil record during the Middle Devonian era, which is around 410 million years into the past. A variety of prehistoric coelacanth was also known to occupy many different bodies of water during the Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic time periods. One of the most interesting details regarding the fish is how it reproduces its young. The predator with a powerful reputation gives birth to their young in a live manner instead of laying eggs like other species.

The females give birth between five and 25 young coelacanths, which possess the amazing ability to survive without the help of others. They are ovoviviparous, meaning the mother develops eggs within her body until they are ready to become hatched into the world. In regards to the birthing process, the live young are referred to as pups. This type of reproductive behavior is not widely known, but some researchers believe that coelacanths are not mature enough to reproduce until they have passed 20 year of age, which they can then enter a gestation time of 13 months.

In the article, "All About the Coelacanth," you will learn additional details regarding the species of fish that is now making headlines in the news.

0

Coelacanth Picture

Also, for the same project I drew this coelacanth. I’ll post the whole thing sometime soon.

coelacanth

0

The Coelacanth a Dinosaur?

I just saw a program on TV that said scientists are puzzled about the Coelacanth, a creature they thought was extinct. It has been found to be alive in the deep sea. They compared this to dinosaurs, saying that this discovery was even more surprising than if a dinosaur walked out of the woods. Well, who knows if small dinosaurs aren’t living in the unexplored forests? How do you define a dinosaur?

Did humans and dinosaurs live at the same time? Why or why not?

Evolutionary biologists supposedly are debating how the Coelacanth fits into the evolutionary chain. Seems like a tight fit. They can always figure out a way to make it work, but it seems like it might be a stretch…

Monday, February 2, 2009

0

Coelacanth Photos fish

Coelacanth is mistery, monster in north sulawesi Manado, Coelacanth symbol of world ocean congres 2009, ok look the photos of dinosaurus fish, just click the photos for zoom:

Sunday, December 14, 2008

0

Coelacanth, Theory Evolution Invalid

THE PRIZE OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMPETITION
“WHY IS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION INVALID?”
IS INCREASED TO 100,000 YTL!


o The competitors of the competition “Why Is the Theory of Evolution Invalid?” held by Science Research Foundation had some righteous demands, stating that given the too many dilemmas of Darwinism, 15 pages is too short for their essays and that the time is inadequate.
o Upon these requests, some changes have been made on the rules of the competition and the GREAT PRIZE IS INCREASED. Entries which will be hand-written on A4 paper will NOT EXCEED 60 PAGES IN LENGTH AND NOT BE LESS THAN 30 PAGES.
o The competition will include two stages. In this first stage of the competition, the prize of the winning contestant is increased to 25,000 YTL. Therunner-up will receive 15,000 YTL and the third prize-winning contestant will receive 10,000 YTL.
o In the second stage of the competition, the winning contestant will receive a prize of 100,000 YTL, the runner-up 50,000 YTL and the third prize-winning contestant 25,000 YTL.
o In the first stage of the competition, contestants will send to our foundation their essays containing comprehensive and convincing information on the subject of all the Darwinist dilemmas that prove the invalidity of evolution, of the kind summarized below. The first 1000 entries received will be considered.
o The contestants will send their theses to the following address of the foundation by mail: Çakırağa mah. Katip Müslihittin sok. Sağlam İşhanı No.3 D.12-13 Aksaray/İstanbul. The last day to receive the essays is extended until 18 October 2009.
o In the second stage of the contest, the scientific essays reaching our foundation will be evaluated by academicians who are experts on the subject and 100 contestants will be entitled to take part in the final.

o The final competition will be held on 6 December 2009, Sunday at a location which will be announced later with the participation of the 100 contestants that are selected by the jury. The contestants will be asked to answer a test consisting of 80 questions.
o The winners will receive their checks at an award ceremony on 28 December 2009.
o The purpose of this competition is to raise young people’s awareness of Darwinism, which has inflicted immense damage on mankind and to put them on their guard against this terrible fraud in science.

SOME DILEMMAS FACING THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION

(1) Life cannot emerge by chance...
Proteins are complex molecules that both constitute the building blocks of living cells and also perform very important tasks within the cell. The odds that an average protein molecule forms by chance have been calculated as “1 in 10950, a figure that far exceeds human imagination. In mathematical terms, this figure represents a probability of “zero.”

(2) There is not a single intermediate fossil…
Although some 100 million fossils belonging to 250,000 separate species have to date been unearthed, not one supports Darwinism. All the fossils discovered belong to fully formed and complete life forms. However, if evolutionists’ claims were true then a great many out of so many fossils should belong to “intermediate life forms,” but not a single one actually does.

(3) “Living fossils” are a response to evolutionary myths...
Living fossils are proofs that refute the theory of evolution’s claim of “gradual development” in a particularly striking way. The reason why these are known as “living fossils” is that despite being hundreds of millions of years old, they are identical to specimens living today. There are living fossils belonging to a great many species, from ants to trees, and from bats to sharks. This represents definitive documentation that evolution never happened in natural history.

(4) The unimaginable information in DNA…
The information regarding all a person’s characteristics, from their physical appearance to the structure of their internal organs, is recorded in a special coding system inside DNA. If we were to put down this genetic information in DNA on paper, we would have to construct a giant library of 900 volumes containing 500 pages each. This unimaginable quantity of information is encoded in the parts of DNA known as “genes.” It is an absolute fact that DNA cannot form by chance.

(5) Organs with irreducible complexity...
Irreducible complexity is a feature that invalidates the claim of gradual development lying at the heart of the theory of evolution. For example, eyes and wings possess irreducible complexity. It is impossible for the structures such as the tear gland, retina and iris, that together comprise the eye, to come into being individually in stages. That is because sight will only take place when all the components making up the eye are present and fully formed. The same thing applies to the wing.

(6) All the variety of life on Earth appeared suddenly 530 million years ago...
Nearly all the phyla (Mollusca, Chordata and similar categories) emerged in the Cambrian Period, 530 million years ago. Only one or two phyla existed in the Pre-Cambrian, whereas more than 50 emerged suddenly in the Cambrian in various regions of the world. Pre-Cambrian life forms had only very simple bodily forms, while those from the Cambrian were incomparably complex. For example, there is no difference between the eye of the trilobite, a life form that emerged in the Cambrian, and the eyes of present-day life forms.

(7) Reptiles are not the ancestors of birds...
Evolutionists are no longer able to point to Archaeopteryx as an intermediate form between reptiles and birds. Investigations of fossils have shown that the creature is not a transitional form, but rather an extinct species of bird with slightly different characteristics to those of present-day birds. The presence of a breastbone (sternum) proving it had powerful flight muscles and an asymmetrical feather structure identical to that in present-day birds show that this animal was able to fly perfectly well.

(8) Fish did not move onto the land...
Evolutionists once used to point to the coelacanth as evidence for the myth of a transition from water to dry land. It was thought that the coelacanth was an intermediate life form between fish and amphibians. However, a “living” coelacanth was caught in the Indian Ocean in 1938. More than 200 other specimens have been caught to date. Analysis of living coelacanths has revealed that the animal is a flawless fish, and that all the previous conjecture based on fossil remains is completely false.

(9) Mutations cannot form new species...
Mutations are breakages and dislocations, caused by radiation or chemical effects, in the DNA molecule located in the nucleus of the living cell and that carries genetic information. DNA has a highly complex structure. For that reason, any random change arising in this molecule can only damage it. Mutations usually lead to irreparable damage, deformity and even death. People subjected to the tragedies of Hiroshima, Nagasaki or Chernobyl are living indications of this. The claim that mutations are an evolutionary mechanism is proof of the dilemma facing the theory of evolution.

(10) Natural selection cannot lead to evolution…
Natural selection means the survival of strong individuals best fitted to environmental conditions. But this does not give rise to new species. For example, in a herd of zebra threatened by predators, it is the fastest-running zebra that will survive, and the herd will gradually turn into a herd of fast-running zebra. But this process is a limited one and it will never turn the zebra into any other species. That is because their skeletal and muscular structure and physiology is recorded in their DNA, and the struggle against predators cannot change that information nor bestow any new genetic information on zebra.

(11) Human beings did not evolve, but were created as human beings...
It has now been brought to light that the human family tree is based solely on evolutionist imagination. Evolutionists maintained that human beings are the result of a gradual transition from "Australopithecines > Homo habilis > Homo erectus> Homo sapiens," in that order. They gave the impression that each of these is the ancestor of the one following it. The fact is, however, that these life forms, which evolutionists’ regard as one another’s forerunners, are actually found alongside one another, which demolishes this fictitious family tree. The latest findings by paleoanthropologists show that Australopithecines, Homo habilis and Homo erectus lived at the same time in different parts of the world.

(12) All the fossil skulls proposed for the supposed evolution of man are false...
All of the fossils proposed for the myth of evolution belong either to apes or to human beings. None of them have any intermediate form characteristics. Darwinist categorization of fossils is based on their speculation on either extinct ape or human fossils. In fact, all the living things classified as Australopithecus and Homo habilis are actually extinct apes, and those classified as Homo erectus and Homo neandertalensis are extinct forms of human being.

(13) The history of evolution is full of fraud...
Instead of declaring the fact there is not one single transitional fossil, Darwinists have sought a solution in manufacturing fake fossils. These fossil forgeries have been displayed in the greatest museums in the world in order to deceive all of humanity. The most known of all these are Piltdown Man, made by attaching an orang utan jaw to a human cranium and exhibited in the British Museum for 40 years, Nebraska Man, reconstructed together with his whole family from a single wild pig’s tooth, the fake feathered dinosaur Archaeoraptor made by putting the bones of various living things together and exhibited in the National Geographic Museum, Haeckel’s fake embryo drawings, the peppered moths glued onto tree trunks, and the false equine series allegedly showing the evolution of the horse that was produced by bringing together totally irrelevant life forms that lived at different times and in different places and is still on display in London’s Natural History Museum.

(14) Darwinists have sought a solution in hiding the fossil record, which did not reveal a single intermediate fossil...
Darwinists conceal fossils. The reason for this is that among all the millions of fossils, NOT A SINGLE ONE supports evolution. Cambrian fossils that declare that the whole variety of life emerged suddenly some 530 million years ago with no evolutionary ancestors behind it, were concealed by an evolutionist scientist for 70 years. The oldest known fossil parrot, dating back 65 million years, which is identical to present-day parrots and thus refutes evolution, was hidden away for 40 years. There are still 100 million fossils unearthed from below the ground and that show that living things were created with all their perfect, complex appearances and have never changed since, that are being concealed by Darwinists.

(15) The complexity of the cell comes as a lethal blow to Darwin’s theory of evolution...
Darwinists are unable to account for the cell, which is a miracle with a complex and perfect structure that Darwin could never dream of in his own day. Many structures in the cell, such as energy production plants, protein manufacturing factories, freight systems carrying raw materials, decoders that translate DNA and communications systems are all in a constant state of flawlessly organized activity, and only a small part of these components are fully understood. The impossibility of even a single protein from among the hundreds of proteins that constitute the cell emerging by chance makes it very clear what a deception the Darwinist claim of the first fictitious cell really is.

(16) The Darwinist claim of vestigial organs is a deception...
Darwinist sources suggested that there were various functionless organs in living things and claimed that these organs were inherited from the supposed forerunners of the life forms in question. For example, the appendix and the coccyx in the human body were for years portrayed as vestigial organs by Darwinists. Scientific progress, however, has totally eliminated this rotten Darwinist claim. All the structures once regarded as vestigial organs have been seen to have their own functions. In the same way, the evolutionist concept of “junk DNA,” the claim that some sections of DNA are useless, has been totally discredited by new discoveries. It has been shown that these parts of DNA actually perform important tasks in the body.

(17) The fact that we only have experience of an image of matter totally demolishes Darwinist philosophy...
One reality scientifically proven in our century is that we never have direct experience of the external original of matter. Electric signals reach us by way of our senses, and the image that forms for us in our brains consists solely of these signals. But we see highly colored, vivid, active, three-dimensional and perfectly sharp images, hear perfectly clear sounds and perceive a flawless outside world. But all these are merely perceptions. It is the soul bestowed on human beings by Allah (God) that perceives, sees and hears them, that understands, thinks, rejoices and yearns. This great reality has totally discredited the materialist and Darwinist mindset, which claims that everything consists of matter.

0

Video Coelacanth Autopsy

FINALLY A COELACANTH GOT WHAT IT WANTED: A HORRIBLE DEATH FOLLOWED BY DESECRATION OF ITS CORPSE


Un gran aporte hacia la ciencia(exepto los huevos) actualmente estoy haciendo un dibujo de los organos internos de este pez, pero como me cuesta encontrar la informacion me baso en los de un paz común lo que signfica un grado de error demasiado elevado por favor ayudenmde a encontrar videos o fotos de su anatomia.

Not to be racist but why is it always the Asians that have to ruin all the great stuff in life that is near extinction?

Not to be racist but why is it always the Asians that have to ruin all the great stuff in life that is near extinction?

It actually tastes oily. In fact its meat is rough like leather. I've eaten one in the Comoros Trust me a 25 cent meal is bad !


So according to you, every handline fisher man, casts his line into the deep blue sea and knows exactly what he is going to catch??? Coelacanths dont live on any sea bed they live in caves 200 to 300 meters deep, Coelacanth ain't a Flounder!!!

They caught by accident, even if it's released it wouldn't survive. So why release it, going to be waste anyways. Much better idea to learn more about it than throwing it away.

There are millions of dumb reasons to kill animals. This is not one of them. This is a Coelacanth, what is seen to be a living transition between fish and Amphibians. They have lungs, fleshy "limbs" and a hinged skull.

0

Coelacanth fish Mascot of the World Ocean Conference (WOC) 2009

Manado. species of ancient fish Coelacanth back found fishermen in the sea waters of North Sulawesi, precisely in the area Talise Island, Likupang Subdistrict, North Minahasa regency. The discovery of ancient fish known as the king of sea fish is the fourth time since 1997.

“Coelacanth (Latimeria menadoensis) in the nets of fishermen found alive. The discovery of this step as this is rare,” said the head of Marine and Fisheries (DKP) North Sulawesi, in Manado, Sunday (30/11).

The discovery of the Coelacanth fish has become a Mascot Mascot of the World Ocean Conference (WOC) 2009. Coelacanth, also known as the ancient fish, which is to appear in the earth the first time about 360 million years old in the days Paleozoikum, or exactly 100 million years before the birth of Dinosaur in the Jurassic period.

"So, this discovery is a historic event. We hope the fish will be examined by a team of experts will be preserved for later. The discovery of ancient fish could Talise around the government plans to strengthen revenue Talise waters and protect the surrounding area as a marine,” he said.

It is said currently, the ancient fish are stored in cooling in Tanawangko, Minahasa. Marine and Fisheries North Sulawesi also is preparing a team of experts who can examine the Coelacanth fish weighing 10 kg, 20 cm thick, 98 cm long and 21 cm wide back.

Data obtained from the Secretariat WOC 2009 Manado, the first time Coelacanth found in South Africa in 1938. Based on this discovery, and then called the Coelacanth fossil life and given the scientific name Latimeria chalumnae and stated as the largest discovery of Zoology at the century-20.

While the discovery of further occur in 1997, 1998, and 2007 in Manado, North Sulawesi. Coelacanth found in manado is classified species Latimeria menadoensis. Coelacanth found on May 19, 2007 weighing 50kg with a length of 132cm. Based on data from research using Remotely operator, service provider Vehicle (ROV) in the last three years, recorded seven tail fish in the waters of Sulawesi Coelacanth.

0

Coelacanth As An Icon Of Faith

Resurrecting The Coelacanth As An Icon Of Faith

By Robert Deyes
ARN Correspondent

In his letter to the Hebrews, the apostle Paul wrote how "faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see" (Ref 1). It would appear that faith has had a major part to play in much of the Darwinian synthesis. Darwinists after all continue to this day to hope for solutions for incongruent data, proclaiming a certainty on an imperfect fossil record and filling in the 'gaps' of theoretical evolutionary sequences with intermediates that they have not seen (Ref 2-3). University of Wisconsin molecular biologist Sean Carroll provided a perfect example of such an application of faith at last month's International Symposium On Human Identification by lifting the iconic status of a well-known fish called the coelacanth to new heights (Ref 4). His message was clear- the coelacanth was and still is a living fossil; a window into the past that gives us a glimpse of how life transitioned from sea onto land. Let us examine the evidence.

It is now considered fact by many evolutionary biologists that early land dwelling vertebrates, the tetrapods, owe their origins to a small group of fish belonging to a family known as the osteolepiforms (Ref 5). These lobed-finned fish supposedly crawled out of the water at the end of a period called the Devonian, almost 350 million years ago, to take up a terrestrial life style (Ref 5). Such a move has been dramatically portrayed through images that show osteolepiforms crawling on paired fins (Ref 6). Data in support of this move continues to be in short supply and the precise details concerning the true identity of osteolepiforms remains extremely vague (Ref 6). Indeed it is questionable whether osteolepiforms were really intermediates in the water-to-land transition or simply an extinct fish group (Ref 6).

The history of the theory describing the water-to-land transition dates back to 1861, just two years after the publication of The Origin Of Species when Thomas Huxley, an ardent Darwin supporter, described the so-called crossopterygian fish (Ref 6). Huxley considered these to be close relatives of the lungfish that at the time was viewed as the most likely candidate for a terrestrial ancestor (Ref 6). It was from Huxley's crossopterygians that the American paleontologist E.D Cope identified the first specimens of a group of fish called the rhipidistians. From their general anatomy- specifically the bone structure and teeth arrangements- rhipidistians bore a likeness to a group of extinct amphibians called the labyrinthodonts (Ref 6). Several other features including nostrils that may have allowed rhipidistians to breath with their mouths closed, seemed to support the idea that rhipidistians were truly a missing link in the evolution of life onto land. Further discoveries followed- the unearthing of another group of fish called elpistotegids from late Devonian strata which appeared to close the gap between fish and tetrapods yet further (Ref 6). Yet this 'ride of discovery' was far from uncontroversial (Ref 6).

The finding of the first coelacanth in 1938 was hailed as a breakthrough in the evolutionary saga for it appeared that here paleontologists had a 'living fossil' upon which to closely study the internal, soft anatomy of a supposed rhipidistian relative (Ref 7). Named after its discoverer Marjorie Courney-Latimer, the story of the coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae) was from the beginning one that was filled with suspense and political intrigue (Ref 7-8). Its internal biology proved to be no less fascinating for it showed no clear cut evidence of having been intermediate for a terrestrial environment and thus was far from what would be expected for a terrestrial ancestor (Ref 7). While its fins were admittedly 'limb like', it had no backbone. Instead it displayed a notochord- a hollow tube filled with oil that ran from the brain to the tail (Ref 7). Some organs were similar to those of sharks and rays while other parts of the soft anatomy, such as vena cava which brings blood back to the heart, resembled those of land animals (Ref 7). The heart itself was extremely fish-like, lacking the right and left division that is characteristic of all land animals. Curiously the coelacanth revealed a number of specialized organs such as a gel-filled cavity in the nose thought to be responsible for detecting electrical impulses from potential prey. The overall picture was not, as many had hoped, unarguably indicative of a terrestrial precursor Indeed, if the internal biology of the rhipidistians had in any way resembled that of the coelacanth then they too would have been far removed from the sea-to-land transition (Ref 7).

Nevertheless, the picture of the coelacanth as a window into life's aquatic origins was heavily publicized (Ref 7). Darwinists supplied a simple exit from the inconsistencies in the data. They claimed that while its outward appearance had changed little over its 400 million year existence, its internal anatomy must have evolved such that its intermediary status between fish and tetrapods was no longer recognizable. Thus the uncertain nature of the coelacanth's soft anatomy was precisely what we would expect to see from a long period of internal evolution (Ref 7). Needless to say, such a proposition was unsupported by any evidence and was merely designed to fit into the pre-conceived model of vertebrate evolution. Indeed paleontologist Niles Eldredge admits that living fossils, such as the coelacanth are today, "something of an embarrassment" for the evolutionary picture (Ref 9, p.108).

Over much of the last century a lot of research into the origins of tetrapods has focused on the osteolepiforms. When cladistics first got its hand on analyzing the interrelationships between this group of fish, it dismissed them as an "ill-defined assemblage of primitive lobe-fins, remote from tetrapods" (Ref 10). In one recent television documentary much was said about current hypotheses on the environmental cues that are believed to have lead to the terrestrial conquest 360 to 410 million years ago (Ref 11). Possible intermediate species such as the fish-like Eusthenopteron found in Quebec at the end of the 19th century as well as the distinctly tetrapod-like Icthyostega- with its rib cage, four limbs and five digits- did not appear to significantly close the gap between sea and land fauna (Ref 11). The jaw of another specimen from the Devonian called Livoniana was equally disappointing. While the jaw itself looked as if it might be intermediate between fish and tetrapods, other features such as its seven rows of teeth were clearly not (Ref 11). Such features were all too easily dismissed as mere evolutionary experiments rather than being seen as valuable pieces of evidence that contradicted the expected picture. Moreover, the incompleteness of the Livoniana specimen left many fundamental questions unanswered.

Harvard paleontologist Alfred Sherwood Romer's original 'drying pond' hypothesis proposed that fish might have needed to make the transition onto land in response to immense droughts that would have dried up their original aquatic habitats (Ref 11). Recent evidence, however, suggests that the late Devonian might have not been so drought-ridden as Romer originally thought. In fact, fossilized plants suggest a more swamp-like Devonian environment (Ref 11). Today some speculate that heavy predation might have been the crucial factor that drove animals out of the water (Ref 11). Of course, such speculation leaves out the crucial question of how fish themselves evolved. According to paleontologist Niles Eldredge, fish like the coelacanth "started with a bang" in the Middle Devonian (Ref 12, p.106)- hardly the kind of descriptive that leads naturally to the conclusion of a gradual step-by-step progression in the origin of complex multi-cellular life.

With names like Sean Carroll to carry their baton, evolutionary biologists can pledge allegiance to icons such as the coelacanth without acknowledging the faith-based aspects of many of their claims. Such is the grave state of the evolutionary story being promulgated today in our schools and colleges.

References & Notes
1. Hebrews 11 vs 1; Bible New International Version

2. The paucity of the fossil record is well documented in the scientific literature (David Raup and Steven Stanley (1971), Principles of Paleontology, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco p.74). Geological processes such as plate subduction make fossil preservation an unlikely occurrence (Niles Eldredge (1987) Life Pulse: Episodes From The Story of The Fossil Record, Facts On File Publications, New York p.72, Jan Zalasiewicz and Alan Collins (2001), Eat Your Crusts, New Scientist, 10 February, 2001, pp.42-45). With the many snapshots that we do find in the fossil record, the picture of multiple intermediates linking life forms to common ancestors rarely arises. In other words, our best evidence becomes no evidence on the premise that the evidence has long since been destroyed by tectonic shifts.

3. It is one thing to write off the lack of a continuous chain of intermediates by adopting a series of plausible explanations; it is another to then assume that you can fill in the gaps with hypothetical intermediates without actually being able to provide any empirical evidence in support of their existence. But as science writer Roger Lewin has noted, filling in the gaps of the fossil record with subjective desires forms an integral part of paleontological study. On the story of human evolution, for example, Lewin wrote, "There is and always has been far more fleshing out of the course and cause of human evolution than can fully be justified by the scrappy skeleton provided by the fossils. As a result", [David Pilbeam] continues, "our theories have often said far more about the theorists than they have about what actually happened."" (Roger Lewin (1987), Bones of Contention: Controversies in the Search for Human Origins, Published by Simon and Schuster, New York p.43)

4. Sean Carroll (2008), The Making Of The Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record Of Evolution, Presented On Tuesday, October 14th, 2008 At The 19th International Symposium On Human Identification

5. Michael Denton (1986) Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Adler and Adler Publishers, Bethesda Maryland, First Edition, pp. 178-180, 182, 194

6. Philippe Janvier (1998), Forerunners of four legs, Nature Vol 395 pp. 748-749

7. The program 'Ancient Creature Of The Deep' describing the biology of the Coelacanth was part of the Nova series on PBS and aired on Wisconsin Public Television on the 21st of January, 2003

8. Philippe Janvier (1999), Coelacanth a la Marseillaise, Nature Vol 401 pp. 854-855

9. Niles Eldredge (1987) Life Pulse: Episodes From The Story of The Fossil Record, Facts On File Publications, New York

10. Per Ahlberg and Zerina Johanson (1998), Osteolepiforms and the ancestry of tetrapods, Nature 395, pp. 792-794

11. The Nova documentary "The Missing Link" aired on Wisconsin Public Television on PBS on October 26th, 2004

12. Niles Eldredge (1987), Life Pulse: Episodes From The Story of The Fossil Record, Facts On File Publications, New York

0

Coelacanth falsifies Evolution

I know many evolutionist will not believe this for several reasons. One is they are taught to believe something without critical thinking and are heavily indoctrinated.

Here is why I believe they are illogical about this great find back in the early 70’s.

The Coelacanth that was found looked virtually identical to what you see in the fossil record. Go here to see what I’m talking about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth#Taxonomy

The problem I have with evolutionist calling the modern day Coelacanth a different species is this. First off they don’t have a DNA sample to compare the genetic information in the earliest Coelacanth to make that claim. It’s a fact things can have difference of appearance in areas but be identical in genetics. Humans are a perfect example. There are white, black, yellow, etc but the genetic comparison between all of us is identical but with different appearance in skin color, noses, eyes, etc and we are still human. We are not looked at as different species of humans lol we are all human beings with differences in appearance.

With Coelacanth how can you call something that looks identical without genetic material to see that? Or are the evolutionist going to call humans different species based on skin color, or nose size, or whatever? That doesn’t make sense because we are genetically human. You won’t find a human with 35 chromosomes (at least I don’t believe you will). You will find those with downs “the presence of an extra copy of genetic material on the 21st chromosome,” is what the problem is with them but they are still human beings and I wouldn’t consider someone with this as a different species that to me would be flat out insulting to someone who is still as a Christian would say “Created in God’s Image” so they have worth and value and shouldn’t be aborted as so many do which is another subject in itself.

So getting back to this Coelacanth. It can’t be consider a different species based on slight differences on the outside when we as humans are not. Who makes that determination without genetic evidence?

It’s all ad hoc explanation. Take this comment on wiki about the gap in the fossil record.

“the Cretaceous genus Macropoma, closely resemble the living species.[citation needed]The most likely reason for the gap is the taxon having become extinct in shallow waters. Deep-water fossils are only rarely lifted to levels where paleontologists can recover them, making most deep-water taxa disappear from the fossil record”

Notice they say “the most likey reason for the gap is the taxon having become extinct in shallow waters” How #1 do they know this without ever being there? Comparing to what happens to day could be very different millions of years ago if you logically think about it. Then they said “Deep-water fossils are only rarely lifted to levels where paleontologists can recover them, making most deep-water taxa disappear from the fossilrecord” Again logically I disagree because fossils clams are pushed to the top of mountains due to shifting of continents (different worldviews from evolutionist and creations by the way) who’s to say that Coelacanth fossils couldn’t have been pushed to the top like those? And they are assuming without a foundation that when those fish died and there had to be millions like there are millions in oceans in fish today there should have been some fossils of those fish that could have been preserved as they love to say “could have”, yes it could have left in between fossils that they love to want people like me to not think it thru.

So in short I find it illogical to call something a different species when they are under the assumption that there was a different species in between deeper Coelacanth as opposed to those at the surface. There simply could have been nothing in between we are not talking about mystery fish here that suddenly disappeared off the face of the earth, no they are still here