I know many evolutionist will not believe this for several reasons. One is they are taught to believe something without critical thinking and are heavily indoctrinated.
Here is why I believe they are illogical about this great find back in the early 70’s.
The Coelacanth that was found looked virtually identical to what you see in the fossil record. Go here to see what I’m talking about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth#Taxonomy
The problem I have with evolutionist calling the modern day Coelacanth a different species is this. First off they don’t have a DNA sample to compare the genetic information in the earliest Coelacanth to make that claim. It’s a fact things can have difference of appearance in areas but be identical in genetics. Humans are a perfect example. There are white, black, yellow, etc but the genetic comparison between all of us is identical but with different appearance in skin color, noses, eyes, etc and we are still human. We are not looked at as different species of humans lol we are all human beings with differences in appearance.
With Coelacanth how can you call something that looks identical without genetic material to see that? Or are the evolutionist going to call humans different species based on skin color, or nose size, or whatever? That doesn’t make sense because we are genetically human. You won’t find a human with 35 chromosomes (at least I don’t believe you will). You will find those with downs “the presence of an extra copy of genetic material on the 21st chromosome,” is what the problem is with them but they are still human beings and I wouldn’t consider someone with this as a different species that to me would be flat out insulting to someone who is still as a Christian would say “Created in God’s Image” so they have worth and value and shouldn’t be aborted as so many do which is another subject in itself.
So getting back to this Coelacanth. It can’t be consider a different species based on slight differences on the outside when we as humans are not. Who makes that determination without genetic evidence?
It’s all ad hoc explanation. Take this comment on wiki about the gap in the fossil record.
“the Cretaceous genus Macropoma, closely resemble the living species.[citation needed]The most likely reason for the gap is the taxon having become extinct in shallow waters. Deep-water fossils are only rarely lifted to levels where paleontologists can recover them, making most deep-water taxa disappear from the fossil record”
Notice they say “the most likey reason for the gap is the taxon having become extinct in shallow waters” How #1 do they know this without ever being there? Comparing to what happens to day could be very different millions of years ago if you logically think about it. Then they said “Deep-water fossils are only rarely lifted to levels where paleontologists can recover them, making most deep-water taxa disappear from the fossilrecord” Again logically I disagree because fossils clams are pushed to the top of mountains due to shifting of continents (different worldviews from evolutionist and creations by the way) who’s to say that Coelacanth fossils couldn’t have been pushed to the top like those? And they are assuming without a foundation that when those fish died and there had to be millions like there are millions in oceans in fish today there should have been some fossils of those fish that could have been preserved as they love to say “could have”, yes it could have left in between fossils that they love to want people like me to not think it thru.
So in short I find it illogical to call something a different species when they are under the assumption that there was a different species in between deeper Coelacanth as opposed to those at the surface. There simply could have been nothing in between we are not talking about mystery fish here that suddenly disappeared off the face of the earth, no they are still here
0 comments:
Post a Comment